Sequence of Returns: Difference in Impact on Lump Sum Investment vs. Annual Contribution vs. Distribution Portfolios

RELATED CONTENT

The Staggering Impact of Sequence of Returns in Retirement Portfolios

It’s not uncommon to compare mutual funds on the basis of their long-term return. But beware. These funds have identical 47-year performance, but shockingly different results when used as the sole ingredient in a retirement portfolio subject to annual RMDs. The key factor: Sequence of returns drastically influences growth in rolling 25-year periods between 1970 and 2016.

When the Sequence of Returns Matters

Depending on the type of portfolio held, investors—especially retirees—can be devastated by an unfavorable sequence of returns. While you can't control the market's performance, you can control the risk level of a portfolio when it is particularly sensitive to losses. Here's how.

The RMD and Its Impact on Retirement Portfolio Survival

The required minimum distribution may be viewed by many retirees as the bad guy, but in fact, it’s designed to stretch the retirement nest egg for a lifetime.

The Lifetime Experience of 34 Investors, 1926–2018

An “investor lifetime” is 60 years: 35 of accumulation and 25 of distribution. But beginning your investing life in 1926 versus 1940 yields quite different results. Here we look at the 34 rolling 60-year periods from 1926–2018—and the market results for 34 unique investor lifetimes.